Lawsuits

Los Alamos National Labs Ariel View

Nuke Watch New Mexico filed a lawsuit against Los Alamos National Labs and DOE in January of 2016. This lawsuit is over LANL and DOE's failure to meet cleanup milestones under the 2005 consent order. The complaint alleges twelve violations of a 2005 Consent Order governing cleanup at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Those violations could result in potential penalties of more than $300 million dollars that would go to the state if only the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) were to enforce them.

“The nuclear weaponeers plan to spend a trillion dollars over the next 30 years completely rebuilding U.S. nuclear forces. Meanwhile, cleanup at the Los Alamos Lab, the birthplace of nuclear weapons, continues to be delayed, delayed, delayed. We are putting the weaponeers on notice that they have to cleanup their radioactive and toxic mess first before making another one for a nuclear weapons stockpile that is already bloated far beyond what we need. Real cleanup would be a win-win for New Mexicans, permanently protecting our water and environment while creating hundreds of high paying jobs.-Nuke Watch Director Jay Coghlan

NukeWatch filed a FOIA request for full PERS for 2019 on January 27, 2020 and received the documents November 18, 2022, after filing the lawsuit.

 

Production of new plutonium pits for unneeded nuclear weapons poses risk of new nuclear arms race.

Nuclear Watch New Mexico is among a coalition of community and public interest groups that has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), challenging the federal agencies’ decision not to examine the possible wider impacts of Los Alamos National Laboratory and Savannah River Site in South Carolina producing these warhead triggers, also known as pits.

A PLUTONIUM PIT IS THE HEART AND TRIGGER OF A NUCLEAR BOMB. PRODUCTION INVOLVES THE EXTENSIVE PROCESSING AND HANDLING OF EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS. IN 2018, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CALLED FOR PRODUCING AT LEAST 80 PITS PER YEAR BY 2030, INCLUDING 30 OR MORE AT LOS ALAMOS AND 50 OR MORE AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE. 

We have pushed for a full program review since 2019, reaching out to DOE and NNSA on six occasions over the legal requirement for a new or supplemental broad, nationwide programmatic environmental impact statement, or PEIS, for producing the larger number of plutonium pits at Los Alamos and the Savannah River Site. NNSA has only conducted fragmented and piecemeal reviews, looking at sites separately rather than examining their combined impacts and risks.

OREPA, NukeWatch, and NRDC have filed a lawsuit against the Uranium Processing Facility (UPF). The UPF is dubbed the 'tip of the spear' for the trillion dollar nuclear modernization project. This case concerns grave risks that the National Nuclear Security Administration ("NNSA") is taking but failing to consider regarding the safety and potential environmental impacts of America's nuclear weapons program, in violation of the National Environmental Policy Act.

In particular, this case challenges the NNSA's refusal to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ("SEIS") to consider important new information about the serious vulnerability of a new design for a Uranium Processing Facility ("UPF") at the Y-12 National Security Complex ("Y-12") in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. This new design is significantly different from the one the agency chose to analyze in 2011.

Most importantly, the NNSA decided to save money on the modernization of the aging Y-12 Complex by not building a single new building to house the entire UPF, but instead constructing several new buildings and continuing to use old and increasingly deteriorating buildings for processing nuclear weapon s components.

Also, this case challenges the NNSA 's plans to implement this major change in the UPF design without considering in a NEPA analysis crucial new information about the increased odds of large earthquakes and the risk that such an earthquake may cause these decrepit buildings to collapse or even explode.

For more...

In January 31, 2018,  DOE and Nuclear Waste Partnership, LLC (NWP) (WIPP co-permittees) file a “Volume of Record” permit modification request with NMED using a new way of calculating the amount of waste disposed of at WIPP. (Instead of counting the outside volume of each container as had been done for decades, DOE can decide the amount of waste in each container.) This change decreased the volume of waste calculated to be at WIPP by about 30 percent.

DOE has provided no new environmental impact statements about the effects on the public of increased disposal and transportation since 1997. They have not done any exposure studies for this current volume increase, as required by RCRA, since then either. Nor have they researched to see if the increase would cause disparate effects on minority communities near the site or near the transportation routes. (It is as important to understand effects along the transportation routes to WIPP as understanding exposures from the WIPP site itself. Perhaps even more important, as almost all the negative health effects from the entire WIPP project during normal operations occur along the transportation routes. )

In January 2019 Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety (CCNS), Nuclear Watch New Mexico (NWNM), and Southwest Research and Information Center (SRIC) file appeals in the New Mexico Court of Appeals, asking the court to overturn the “Volume of Record” permit modification.

Throughout the 1960s, government scientists searched for an appropriate site for radioactive waste disposal, eventually testing a remote desert area of southeastern New Mexico where, 250 million years earlier, evaporation cycles of the ancient Permian Sea had created a 2,000-foot-thick salt bed.

In 1979, Congress authorized the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The WIPP facility, located 26 miles southeast of Carlsbad, N.M., was constructed during the 1980s. Congress limited WIPP to the disposal of defense-generated TRU wastes. In 1998, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified WIPP for safe, long-term disposal of TRU wastes.

Transuranic, or TRU, waste began accumulating in the 1940s with the beginning of the nation’s nuclear defense program.

WIPP was closed for nearly three years after a February 2014 radiation release, and 2018 marked its first full year since reopening of receiving TRU waste shipments. It resumed taking shipments of waste from DOE generating sites in April 2017 and received 133 by the end of the year. The Energy Department projects roughly 400 shipments for 2019. It could release a more detailed report on those expectation in coming weeks.

By comparison, WIPP took in 724 shipments in 2013, its last full year or operation prior to the accident. Energy Department Carlsbad Field Office Manager Todd Shrader does not expect anything close to those numbers before a new underground ventilation system goes into operation in fall 2021.

About 97 percent of the anticipated contact-handled TRU waste expected to eventually find its way to WIPP will come from large-quantity sites such as Hanford, Idaho, LANL, Oak Ridge, and SRS, according to DOE’s recently released Annual Transuranic Waste Inventory Report for 2018. Likewise, about 95 percent of the more radioactive remote-handled TRU waste is expected to come from these sites.

For more...

* On April 30, 2020, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) released its Final Report that Congress requested on the proposed “dilute and dispose” method proposed for 34 metric tons or more of surplus plutonium from nuclear weapons. The Report includes Figure S-5 that shows that without the Volume of Record (VOR), waste proposed for WIPP is more than 150 percent of the legal limit and that the waste will exceed the legal limit even with the VOR recalculation.

WIPP Volume of Record Lawsuit News

It seems we can’t find what you’re looking for. Perhaps searching can help.