Nuke Watch Logo 5k

Important Documents Related to the Nuclear Weapons Complex


Nuclear Watch Site Navigation

Nuclear Watch Home
Fact Sheets and Documents
Press Releases
Watchdog Newsletter
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Sandia National Laboratories
Pantex Plant
Kansas City Plant

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Important Documents on the Nuclear Weapons Complex
Budget and Economic Information
Mailing List
Links
General Information
Awards
Donate

only search nukewatch.org

The FY2011 NNSA Stockpile Stewardship and Management (SSM) Plans:

NNSA’s Ten-Year Site Plans, Current, FY2009-2018:

* Kansas City Plant [2.2MB]
* Los Alamos National Laboratory [23.9MB]
* Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [5.6MB]
* Nevada Site Office [3.7MB]
* Pantex Plant [1.5MB]
* Sandia National Laboratories [13.6MB]
* NNSA Savannah River Site Office [6.5MB]
* Y-12 National Security Complex [6.1MB]
* Office of Secure Transportation [264KB]
* NNSA Service Center [660KB]

Labs Directors' 2010 Letters to House Armed Services Committee - January 2010

Republican Senators' Letter on Modernization and START Sent to President Obama -December 15, 2009

FY 2010–2014 SUPPLEMENT TO THE STOCKPILE STEWARDSHIP PLAN, NNSA - December 2009

NNSA’s FY 2008 Performance Evaluation Report for the Los Alamos National Security, LLC’s Management and Operation of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, Performance Period: October 1, 2007 Through September 30, 2008

America’s Strategic Posture-The Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States [61KB] -May 2009

REDUCING THE COST OF THE U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMPLEX, Testimony of Richard Garwin [278KB] -March 17, 2009

Constructing a 21st Century Nuclear Posture, Rep. Ellen Tausher remarks at the Center for American Progress [92KB] –November 17, 2008

Final Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Complex Transformation SPEIS, DOE/EIS-0236-S4) [44.6MB] - October 2008

Global Fissile Material Report 2007- technical basis for policy initiatives to secure and irreversibly reduce stocks of nuclear weapons and fissile materials, prepared by the International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM), an independent group of arms-control and nonproliferation experts from sixteen countries, including both nuclear weapon and non-nuclear weapon states. [8.8MB] -October 9th, 2007

Santa Clara Pueblo's Comments on the Draft Complex Transformation Supplemental Programatic Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-0236-S4)[1.8MB] - May 13, 2008

NNSA Guidance on Release of Documents under FOIA [11.5MB] - May 2008

Nuclear Weapons Complex Transformation SPEIS (as a single, searchable PDF) [39MB] -January 2008

Radiological Effluents Released from U. S. Continental Tests 1961 through 1992 (DOE/NV_317), U.S. DOE [1.8MB] -August 1996

Linking Legacies- Connecting the Cold War Nuclear Weapons Production Processes to Their Environmental Consequences, U.S. DOE  [18.6MB] -January 1997

Letter from Representatives Visclosky and Hobson in a sharp response to the lame arguments on nuclear policy and RRW put forward in a joint statement issued by the administration's Secretaries of Defense, Energy and State (Gates-Bodman-Rice) on July 24.  [100KB] -August 1, 2007

The joint Gates-Bodman-Rice statement on nuclear policy and RRW -July 24, 2007

UPDATE OF THE PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF SEISMIC DESIGN GROUND MOTIONS AT THE LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY (PSHA) Prepared for Los Alamos National Laboratory by Wong, el al, URS Corporation Seismic Hazards Group, [36.9MB] - 25 May, 2007

AAAS Report on The Role of the Reliable Replacement Warhead in the US Weapons Program [1.4MB] -April, 2007

JASON Plutonium Pit Lifetime Report [404KB] -November 28, 2006

Selected pages relevant to the Science Complex from Los Alamos’ FY05 & FY06 Ten Year Comprehensive Site Plans  [704 kb] -June 2006

Complete LANL presentation on the Science Complex  [6M] -June 2006

Complex 2030 - A preferred Infrastructure Planning Scenario for the Nuclear Weapons Complex [1.9MB PowerPoint] -May 2006

Eminent Weapons Scientist, R. Garwin Challenges Need for RRW [1.1M] (Courtesy of the Union of Concerned Scientists) - March 22, 2006

Nuclear Weapons, Environmental Management, and Nuclear Waste FY07 Budget Highlights [83KB] -February 8, 2006: Nuclear Weapons Activity Increases as Budget for Cleanup of Weapons Complex Decreases

Letter from Gov. Bill Richardson to DOE Secretary Spencer Abraham on LANL TA-18 [2 MB] October 2004

Excerpts on the National Nuclear Security Administration's assessment of University of California management of Los Alamos Lab for FY03. [50k] August 2004

Declaration of J Carson Mark (Regarding DARHT) [376KB] -October 20, 1995

Sustaining the Nuclear Enterprise [280 KB]

1993 Sandia Stockpile Lifetime Study [1.1M]

Nuclear Posture Review Excerpts

Differentiation and Defense: An Agenda for the Nuclear Weapons Program

Report to Congress on the Defeat of Hard and Deeply Buried Targets

Biological Weapons Convention Treaty

JASON Review of Remanufacturing Nuclear Weapons Components -Senior nuclear weapons scientists say pit lifetimes are now discussed as 60 to 90 years.

A White Paper: Pursuing a New Nuclear Weapons Policy for the 21st Century

Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty

Managing the Nation's Nuclear Materials: The 2025 Vision for the Department of Energy

Audit Report: Management of the Nuclear Weapons Production Infrastructure

Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship

Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century

Constitution of the United States of America

NonProliferation Treaty - 1970

Final Document Issued by 2000 NPT Review Conference

Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty

The International Court of Justice Opinion on the Legality of Use or Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons

Freedom of Information Act

All comments on these documents, unless otherwise stated, are made by NWNM.

 


Report to Congress on the Defeat of Hard and Deeply Buried Targets (HDBT)

This is not a NWNM report, this a report submitted by the Secretary of Defense in conjunction with the Secretary of Energy

Indirectly related to the HDBT report is the fact that the "Target" of Los Alamos' plutonium production campaign is to produce both existing stockpile pits and "new-design pits without underground testing." Please see our fact sheet:
An Overview of Present and Future U.S. Plutonium Pit Production (37kb)

Also of interest:

Alterations, Modifications, Refurbishments, and Possible New Designs for the US Nuclear Weapons Stockpile (365kb)

Alterations, Modifications, Refurbishments, and Possible New Designs For the US Nuclear Weapons Stockpile
(html)

Nuclear Watch of New Mexico

551 W. Cordova Rd. #808
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505.989.7342 - phone and fax

info@nukewatch.org

Top