Incredibly, the NNSA does not have an integrated master schedule for simultaneous pit production, long recommended by the independent Government Accountability Office (GAO). NNSA plans to produce at least 30 pits per year by 2026 at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in northern New Mexico and at least 50 pits per year by 2030 at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina. The agency has admitted that the 2030 date is already long delayed. NNSA last gave an overall cost estimate for expanded pit production in 2018 of $43 billion over 30 years.
That did not include $7-8 billion in sunk costs for the failed MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility at SRS which NNSA now seeks to “repurpose” to pit production. But even that estimated “repurpose” cost has already more than doubled to $11 billion. Thus, the estimated cost for expanded plutonium pit production is more on the order of $55 billion and rising. To add to this, the Department of Energy (which includes NNSA) has been on the GAO’s “High Risk List” for project mismanagement since 1991.
Further, NNSA has refused to complete a new programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) on expanded plutonium pit production. NNSA is legally relying upon the last one completed in 2008, which did not contemplate simultaneous pit production at two different sites, nor other sites directly involved in related programs (the Livermore Lab, the Kansas City Plant, the Pantex Plant). A new PEIS is clearly required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) given that an agency must consider significant “new information and changed circumstances” which have obviously occurred since 2008. NNSA is denying the public its legal right under NEPA to analyze and comment on a proposed major federal action.
Finally, the fundamental need for expanded plutonium pit production is not clear. With respect to concerns about potential plutonium aging, Los Alamos Director Thom Mason has stated, “The best way to deal with this dilemma is to take it off the table. We do that by making new pits, immediately.” But independent experts concluded in 2006 that pits last at least a century (they are currently around 40 years old). Moreover, the U.S. already has at least 15,000 pits in storage. No pit production is scheduled to maintain the safety and reliability of the existing nuclear weapons stockpile – instead it is all for future new designs that could prompt the U.S. back into testing. Thus, Rep. Garamendi’s call for a new independent pit lifetime study is on the mark.
If you, family or friends have a Member of Congress on the House Armed Services Committee, please call them by Wednesday June 22 to express your support for this prudent amendment before NNSA starts wasting your taxpayer dollar. Time is of the essence!
(Please feel free to use any or all of the text of this action alert. See list below for House ASC members.)