Facility Spotlight: GAO Blasts Lack of Whistleblower Protection at Nuclear Facilities "The GAO's findings of abysmal whistleblower protection at the Department of Energy are not by accident or coincidence. DOE whistleblower retaliation is historic, systemic and by design, seeking to suppress public knowledge of the inside secrets of the dirty nuclear weapons business. Now is the time for serious oversight and a realistic approach to these issues in order to stop an emerging arms race and avoid wasting billions of dollars we cannot afford." -Jay Coghlan, executive director, Nuclear Watch New Mexico (McClatchy: Department of Energy fails to protect nuclear whistleblowers) / (read more)
Nuclear Weapons Complex Misconduct
Dec. 3, 2015. POGO: Updated Federal Contractor Misconduct Database, focussing on Nuclear Complex
(see report at POGO)
Click the image to view and download this large printable map of DOE sites, commercial reactors, nuclear waste dumps, nuclear transportation routes, surface waters near sites and transport routes, and underlying aquifers. This map was prepared by Deborah Reade for the Alliance for Nuclear Accountability.
Quote of the Week
"Because the flight time of a ballistic missile is only 15 to 30 minutes, decisions that could result in hundreds of millions of deaths would have to be made within minutes. This creates a significant possibility of an accidental nuclear war or even hackers causing launches.
"The U.S. does not need this posture to maintain deterrence, because it has about 800 warheads on untargetable submarines at sea at any time. If there is a nuclear war, however, U.S. Strategic Command and Russia's Strategic Missile Forces want to be able to use their vulnerable land-based missiles before they can be destroyed. So the cold war may be over, but the Doomsday Machine that came out of the confrontation with the Soviets is still with us- and on a hair trigger."
-Frank von Hippel, emeritus professor at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and co-founder of Princeton's Program on Science and Global Security
(Scientific American, Sept 1, 2016)
Dossier: The Kirtland AFB Nuclear Weapons Complex
Kirtland Air Force Base, which abuts and shares some runways with the Albuquerque airport, has become a major nuclear weapons complex of it's own. It hosts the Air Force's Nuclear Weapons Center, Sandia National Laboratories, and what is probably the nation's (and perhaps the world's) largest repository of nuclear weapons, estimated at up to 2,500 warheads... (read more)
"You have got to understand that this isn't a military weapon. It's used to wipe out women and children and unarmed people, and not for military uses. So we have got to treat this differently from rifles and cannon and ordinary things like that." -Pres. Truman 1948 (ref)
KUNM FM: LANL's Long Environmental Cleanup
KUNM public radio discussion of Los Alamos cleanup, and Nukewatch lawsuit Archived podcast here
Jay Coghlan, Nukewatch Director Interview
Earth Matters Radio re legacy of the US nuclear weapons program on the 70th anniversary of the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombings. Thursday Aug 6 at 10 am and 8 pm on 89.1FM. Archived podcast here
Los Alamos: A Whistleblower's Diary, by Chuck Montaño, 2015.
April 21, Los Alamos Daily:
Chuck Montaño was given the ANA Whistleblower award in Washington DC: (story)
Chuck Montaño serves on Nuclear Watch New Mexico's Steering Committee.
Successful Citizen Activism Against
Expanded U.S. Plutonium Pit Production
This is the unsung story of successful citizen activism against repeated government attempts to expand the production of plutonium pit cores, which has always been the choke point of resumed U.S. nuclear weapons production. This history is a critical part of the march toward a future world free of nuclear weapons. We gratefully dedicate it to Leroy Moore, longtime activist with the Rocky Mountain Peace and Justice Center, and J. Carson Mark, retired director of the Los Alamos Lab's Theoretical Division and ardent arms control advocate.
(View/download full report- PDF)
July 14, 2016: Debate Is On Over Making More Nuclear Triggers At Los Alamos Lab
"The National Nuclear Security Administration is under orders from Congress to produce as many as 80 new nuclear weapons triggers a year by around 2030, and Los Alamos National Laboratory is the only place in the country that is equipped to make them now... The plans for a higher-capacity plutonium pit production facility make Los Alamos key - some call the lab 'ground zero'..." (ref: Albuquerque Journal)
Brief terrifying history of US nuclear mishaps
Eric Schlosser recounts the United States' clumsy history with nuclear weapons. And it's terrifying.
Jan 26, 2016 Doomsday Clock: Three Minutes to Midnight
"The world situation remains highly threatening to humanity, and decisive action to reduce the danger posed by nuclear weapons and climate change is urgently required."
(The Bulletin, Jan 26, 2016)
Who Will Claim Ronald Reagan's Mantle On Nuclear Disarmament Today?
"A nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. The only value in our two nations possessing nuclear weapons is to make sure they will never be used. But then would it not be better to do away with them entirely?" -1984 State of the Union
"We seek the total elimination one day of nuclear weapons from the face of the Earth."
-Inaugural Address, 1985
"My dream is to see the day when nuclear weapons will be banished from the face of the Earth."
-from "Ronald Reagan and His Quest to Abolish Nuclear Weapons" by Paul Lettow
(Read more of "Ronald Reagan, Republicans, and Nuclear Weapons" by Jonathan Granhoff, President, Global Security Institute)
The nuclear threat has changed. Former U.S. Secretary of Defense Bill Perry tells a harrowing story of a false alarm that almost set off nuclear Armageddon. Former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn explains why we can't rely on technology to work perfectly in an age of cyber attack and terror.
Recent visitors - click to enlarge
Help us boost public awareness of the reality and risks of nuclear weapons today. Please share Nukewatch.org with your friends using the buttons below:
"If you really want a future world free of nuclear weapons, you can hardly make a better investment than to give to Nuclear Watch New Mexico. They need and deserve your support so that they can carry on their groundbreaking work. I urge you to be generous with them!" - Danielle Brian, Executive Director, Project on Government Oversight.
For immediate release, September 21, 2016 New Mexican Politicians Should Not Be Misled-
Energy Dept. Misrepresents Cost and Scope of Los Alamos Cleanup
"...The DOE report is far from honest. It intentionally omits any mention of approximately 150,000 cubic meters of poorly characterized radioactive and toxic wastes just at Area G alone (LANL's largest waste dump), an amount of wastes 30 times larger than DOE acknowledges in the 2016 Lifecycle Cost Estimate. In reality, DOE and LANL plan to not clean up Area G, instead installing an "engineered cover" and leaving the wastes permanently buried. This will create a permanent nuclear waste dump above the regional groundwater aquifer, three miles uphill from the Rio Grande. Radioactive and toxic wastes are buried directly in the ground without liners, and migration of plutonium has been detected 200 feet below Area G's surface..."
(read full press release PDF)
- Sept 21, Albuquerque Journal:
Nuke Watch: Lab cleanup report understates costs, waste amounts at Los Alamos
- More on this issue: LANL Cleanup
Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter's Nuclear Resolve Tour
Bombs, Deterrence, and Reassurance on the Menu:
Putting Any Doubts to Rest
Departing Sept 26, itinerary:
1. Minot AFB- "For a speech on the future of America's nuclear capability." (moving ahead with 'modernization')
2. Kirtland AFB - "To thank personnel at Kirtland AFB for their work to ensure the readiness of the nuclear force."
3. Los Alamos and Sandia Labs - "To thank the scientists and engineers there for ongoing work on the development, assessment, and security of the nuclear triad."
4. San Diego - for a speech on the future of the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region and ongoing security challenges there. (read: China, North Korea)
5. Pearl Harbor - to host a conference of ASIAN defense ministers, including "demonstrations of U.S. military capabilities" and a dinner aboard the USS Missouri. (reassuring those under the US nuclear umbrella) (ref)
Where Do The Candidates Stand on Nuclear Weapons?
As a senator (2001-2009) and as Secretary of State (2009-20012) Clinton has a track record of supporting the CTBT and non-pro-
liferation efforts (e.g, the deal with Iran), and she helped negotiate reductions in deployed warheads in the US and Russia. She seems to be middle of the road when it comes to nuclear weapons, saying, like Obama, that the US ultimately aims to rid the world of them altogether (though maybe not in our lifetime). Clinton has the support of the military-industrial complex, which doesn't trust Trump, and while she has criticized the trillion dollar nuclear modernization program, is unlikely to take a bold lead in new nuclear weapons reduction treaties if there is any kind of headwind.
- Clinton, in an interview Sept 18, 2015:
"I think we should have a high-level commission of really well-respected people from different walks of life, who have not lived their life completely in the military-industrial world, really taking a hard look [at the nuclear arsenal and the trillion dollar modernization plans], the same way we have had to in the past look at closing bases.
"A system was put in place where there could be somewhat less influence from Congressional politics, and I'd like to see such a commission come up with recommendations. Because what I hear all the time, what I saw as a senator- I served on the Armed Services Committee- and what I saw as Secretary of State is that very often the leadership of the Defense Department wants to eliminate certain spending, or wants to change it, and they're stopped by Congress. So what I'm looking for is a way of avoiding that."
-from "Asking Hillary About Nuclear Weapons" by Judy Elliott for Governing Under the Influence.
"Before Trump, Americans hadn't worried this much about nuclear weapons since the Cold War". That's the headline of an article in the LA Times August 18. It seems that with all the talk about Trump's brash character and impulsiveness, worry has been fanned about him having 'his finger on the nuclear button'; apparently most Americans had forgotten about this aspect of the Cold War nuclear standoff with the Soviet Union, that there would be zero time for consultations - just enough for one person- ergo the President- to enter the codes and launch Armageddon.
Trump doesn't seem to have thought out a coherent policy on nuclear weapons; leaving journalists to interpret his 'remarks' - which sometimes seem to go against the fundamental tenets of deterrence and non-proliferation.
Interestingly, Ron Rosenbaum, who interviewed Trump in 1987 about his views on nuclear weapons, wrote recently in an article for Slate that he was surprised to find that Trump had already given a lot of thought to the nuclear weapons problem, to avoiding nuclear war, to non-proliferation, and spoke about these things with sincerity.
"He knew about the dangerous reality of a 'hair trigger' nuclear 'posture.' He said he had an uncle who was a nuclear scientist who made him aware of the all-too-easy proliferation of nuclear weapons. He had read Strobe Talbott's sagacious history of the START talks, Deadly Gambits."
Rosenbaum summed up saying, "It's not that I think he's got the solution, but I like the visionary urgency he brings to the problem. I like the fact that he's using his Washington contacts, the access his money buys him, to bug the torpid Reaganauts to do something rational in the nuclear realm."
See Rosenbaum's article for Slate. His original 1987 article accompanies.
A group of 50 former national security officials, including Michael Chertoff, Tom Ridge, Michael Hayden, John Negroponte and Robert Zoellick, have signed an open letter calling Donald Trump unqualified to be president and warning that, if elected, "he would be the most reckless President in American history."
Trump said the letter writers share the blame for 'making the world such a dangerous place... They are nothing more than the failed Washington elite looking to hold onto their power, and it's time they are held accountable for their actions.'" (ref) - Sept 6:Trump Endorsed by 88 Retired Military Figures - Sept 13:
James Woolsey, head of CIA during Bill Clinton's first term, will join the Trump campaign as national security advisor. Woolsey had been a strong proponent of invading Iraq, and more recently, opposed the Iran deal. (ref)
According to an NBC News/SurveyMonkey online poll released in early September, only 44% of respondents trusted Clinton with nuclear weapons. Only 24% said they trusted Trump with them. (ref)
UN OEWG concludes with major breakthrough in effort to ban nuclear weapons
In the most contentious of three recommendations to the General Assembly,
62 countries declared their support for:
"The convening by the General Assembly of a conference in 2017 open to all states, international organizations, and civil society, to negotiate a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons leading towards their total elimination."
(Of the 27 opposed, most were NATO countries, with Australia and South Korea - countries under the US 'nuclear umbrella')
"This breakthrough is result of the new global discourse on nuclear weapons. Since Norway hosted the first conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons in 2013, the effect of the weapons on humans and the environment has taken center stage. Three conferences were held on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons (Norway, Mexico, Austria). These brought together governments, academia and civil society for fact-based examination of what the weapons can do- and what can be done to mitigate their effect. The conferences found that there is no way to recover from any use of nuclear weapons in populated areas, and no way to prevent the damage from crossing borders..."
"International treaties exist to prohibit all other weapons of mass destruction (chemical and biological) as well as to outlaw other weapons with indiscriminate effects (anti-personnel landmines and cluster bombs). The fact that nuclear weapons are not clearly illegal is simply bizarre.
"No weapon has ever been eliminated before it was made illegal, and nuclear weapons are no exception. A ban would not only make it illegal for nations to use or possess nuclear weapons; it would also help pave the way to their complete elimination. Nations committed to reaching the goal of abolition have shown that they are ready to start negotiations in 2017."
- (read more of ICAN's coverage)
- Susi Snyder (PAX-Netherlands) Op-Ed in Huffington Post
- Ray Acheson, Reaching Critical Will- Editorial
- UN Tribune : UN Votes to Begin Negotiations on a Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapons
For immediate release August 10, 2016: NNSA Set to Approve New Facilities for Expanded Plutonium Pit Production Without Credible Plans and Required Public Review
The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is a semi-autonomous nuclear weapons agency within the Department of Energy, which has the singular distinction of being the only federal department on the GAO's High Risk List for wasting taxpayer dollars for 25 consecutive years. LANL is NNSA's so-called "Plutonium Center of Excellence" and the nation's only site for pit production, but major operations at PF-4, its main plutonium facility, have been stopped since June 2013 because of nuclear criticality safety concerns. In addition, there is no place for LANL to send its radioactive transuranic wastes from plutonium pit production since one of its waste drums ruptured at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in February 2014 and indefinitely closed that multi-billion facility.
Despite all this, funding for NNSA's nuclear weapons research and production programs is being increased to nearly double the Cold War's historic average, while nonproliferation, warhead dismantlement and cleanup programs are being cut or held flat...
August 12, Albuquerque Journal: LANL Plutonium Project Called 'a House of Cards'
"Jay Coghlan, director of Nuclear Watch New Mexico, said the GAO report reveals the CMMR project to be 'a house of cards.'" (more)
August 9, 2016 Nuclear Disarmament: Basel Peace Office Makes a Novel Proposal in Final Days of UN OEWG
The final session of the UN nuclear disarmament working group (#OEWG) opened in Geneva on Friday August 5; governments will meet for another 4-5 days over the next two weeks, to discuss the OEWG draft report, with the aim to adopt the final report on August 19 for submission to the UN General Assembly.
Of particular note: Basel Peace Office introduced a working paper which expanded on a novel proposal calling for a nuclear-ban amendment conference of the Non-Proliferation Treaty. If one-third of the States Parties to the NPT call for such a conference, the NPT depositories (Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) are legally obliged to hold the conference, invite all States Parties to the NPT to attend and discuss the proposed nuclear weapons ban. "Such an NPT conference could therefore build political momentum and legal impact for a nuclear ban, particularly in nuclear-armed and allied states." (more at UnfoldZero) / (view/download Basel Peace Office proposal full text PDF)
August 8, 2016, New York Times Editorial: A Nuclear Legacy Within Reach
"The Air Force has formally begun the process of asking defense contractors to submit proposals for a new long-range cruise missile and a new land-based intercontinental ballistic missile. These two weapons, capable of carrying nuclear payloads, will cost billions of dollars. The first is unnecessary; the second, debatable.
"The invitations are ostensibly aimed at modernizing the nation's nuclear arsenal. The weapons' dubious value aside, the requests also seem to contradict President Obama's 2009 promise to change American nuclear policy in ways that would make the nation safer by reducing threats from the world's most lethal weapons.
"The new cruise missile, faster and with a greater range than the existing version, should be canceled.
And some defense experts, like former Defense Secretary William Perry, have argued that the land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles are no longer needed.
"If Mr. Obama is unwilling to cancel either of these programs, he should at least give his successor the political space to rethink such investments by appointing a commission to examine the full range of the Pentagon's modernization plans.
"The Pentagon and some Republicans are resisting many of these ideas. But Mr. Obama still has the responsibility and, if he moves swiftly, the time to advance his vision of a safer world." (more) Questions About America's Nuclear Policy
The Times editorial got a lot of attention. Here are some of the letters to the editors that followed.
Update Sept 6, NYTimes: Obama has decided not to declare a no-first-use nuclear policy A change was opposed by Sec. Def. Ash Carter, Sec. State John Kerry, and Energy Sec. Ernst Moniz. (report, NYTimes)
71 Years. August 6, Hiroshima; August 9, Nagasaki.
"I come and stand at every door" - poem by Naz§m Hikmet; music: Fazil Say
August 6. It's now 71 years since an American plane dropped a nuclear bomb on the city of Hiroshima, then another on the city of Nagasaki. Nuclear weapons have not been used in war since then- "by some measure of skill, luck, and divine intervention, and I suspect the latter in the greatest proportion"- as General Lee Butler, former StratCom chief, put it. But recently former Defense Secretary William Perry and others have warned that we are drifting closer now to nuclear disaster than at any time in the Cold War. And we have begun a massive renewal/modernization of our nuclear arsenal- bombs, delivery systems, the nuclear weapons labs....
On July 10, the Washington Post reported that President Obama, who had spoken eloquently about ridding the world of nuclear weapons in 2009, but had accomplished little on that front since, was planning some "major nuclear policy changes in his final months".
With many experts hoping Obama would announce a reform of nuclear posture, and a scale-back in the trillion dollar modernization plans; the debate was on.
- 14 Senators- most from Nuclear weapons complex states- had just sent a letter to Obama urging him to continue "robust" spending on modernization of all legs of the triad. (Signed by: John Hoeven (R ND), Steve Daines (R MT), Orrin Hatch (R Utah), Marco Rubio (R FL), David Vitter (R LA), John Barrasso (R WY) and Deb Fischer (R NE), and Democrats Tim Kaine (D VA), Joe Donnelly (D IN), Heidi Heitkamp (D ND), Mark Warner (D VA), Martin Heinrich (D NM), Jack Reed (D RI) and Jon Tester (D MT). (more)
- On July 20 House Armed Services Chairman Ranking Member Adam Smith, D-Wash. issued a letter to the President which urged a no-first-use policy declaration and the elimination of the launch-on-warning nuclear posture as "steps that could avoid an unintentional or hasty start to unprecedented and catastrophic nuclear devastation." (ref) Five ranking members signed on: Reps. Smith; Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., of the Budget Committee; Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, of the Appropriations Energy and Water Development Subcommittee; Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif., of the Armed Services Tactical Air and Land Subcommittee; Jackie Speier, D-Calif., of the Armed Services Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. (ref)
- Also on July 20, a separate letter to Obama from 10 Senators (Ed Markey, Al Franken, Jeffrey Merkley, Elizabeth Warren, Patrick Leahy, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Bernie Sanders, Sherrod Brown, and Ron Wyden) urged Obama to "take bold action in your final months in office to restrain U.S. nuclear weapons spending and reduce the risk of nuclear war." (more)
- Then, on July 29, as if to cut short the debate and move on to the exciting stuff, the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center at the Kirtland AFB nuclear weapons complex issued RFPs for the new nuclear cruise missile (LRSO) and a replacement ICBM (GBSD), the very weapons systems most often mentioned as unnecessary and dangerous; then, on August 1 NNSA announced that the new 'more useful' and much-criticized B61-12 nuclear bomb was ready for production engineering.
(See our dossiers on the LRSO nuclear cruise missile and the B61-12 bomb)
[LRSO = Long Range Stand Off] [GBSD = Ground Based Strategic Deterrent]
Meanwhile, there are, for those who listen for such things, worries and rumors of war- in Europe,East Asia, South Asia... Particularly concerning are the growing military tensions between US-NATO and Russia, our equal partner in planetary destructive capability, each of us having thousands of warheads aimed at each other. To those who say it's not the time to reduce our nuclear forces, we say it is exactly the time to do it, before they end up being used, to our everlasting regret. We should have done more long ago; it's not too late to do it now.
Could a nuclear war really break out somewhere? How would that happen? Below is a BBC production which takes a look at that question, made earlier this year, after Turkish forces shot down the Russian jet.
NYTimes August Book Review:
Almighty: Courage, Resistance, and Existential Peril in the Nuclear Age
By Dan Zak, reviewed by Kai Bird
"Zak's narrative is a perfectly measured blend of biography, suspense and history. He skillfully uses the small, finite story of the Y-12 protest [the break-in 4 years ago by Sister Rice and friends] to explore our national identity as a people whose culture is now intimately connected with things nuclear. Our bomb culture has not come cheap; the environmental costs have been devastating for many communities. And even though scores of governments- but not our own- are on record supporting a treaty that would ban nuclear weapons, Zak shows this is still an outlier dream. He quotes a United States admiral intoning: 'I don't see us being nuclear-free in my lifetime. Or in yours.'
"We are stuck with Armageddon in our dreams. And in the meantime the Sister Megans of our bomb culture will no doubt try again and again to cry out against our complacency. But truly, it seems hopeless. As Billy Pilgrim laments repeatedly in Kurt Vonnegut's 'Slaughterhouse-Five', 'So it goes.'"
(more at NYTimes)
For immediate release, July 28, 2016 LANL Estimate of $2.9 Billion for "Remaining" Cleanup Leaves Nuclear and Toxic Wastes Behind and Kills Needed Jobs
"Santa Fe, NM. The Department of Energy (DOE) has announced that the cost of "Remaining Legacy Cleanup" of radioactive and toxic wastes from more than 70 years of nuclear weapons research and production at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) will cost $2.9 billion through fiscal year 2035, averaging $153 million per year.
"That cost estimate clearly assumes that the Lab's major radioactive and toxic wastes dumps will not be cleaned up. Instead they will be "capped and covered," leaving some 200,000 cubic yards of radioactive and toxic wastes at Area G, its largest waste dump. Those wastes sit in unlined pits and trenches, 800 feet above groundwater and three miles uphill from the Rio Grande (plutonium contaminants have been detected 200 feet below Area G). During this same period of time the Lab's nuclear weapons programs that caused the mess to begin with will cost ten times as much, even before expected funding increases for expanded production of plutonium bomb core "pits" and increasingly aggressive "Life Extension Programs" that give existing nuclear weapons new military capabilities..." (View/download full press release PDF)
For immediate release, July 19, 2016 Nuclear Watch NM Amends LANL Cleanup Lawsuit - Claims New Consent Order To Be Invalid
"Nuclear Watch New Mexico has amended its federal lawsuit against the Department of Energy (DOE) and Los Alamos National Security, LLC (LANS) that alleges twelve violations of a 2005 Consent Order governing cleanup at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). Those violations could result in potential penalties of more than $300 million dollars that would go to the state, if only the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) were to enforce them. Nuclear Watch now asks the court to declare the new 2016 Consent Order to be invalid because the requirement for the opportunity of a public hearing was not met."
(view/download full press release PDF)
Turkey Failed Coup: What About Those Nuclear Weapons Stored at Incirlik?
Hans Kristensen, Federation of American Scientists: "The security situation in Turkey and in the base area no longer meet the safety requirements that the United States should have for storage of nuclear weapons. You only get so many warnings before something goes terribly wrong. It's time to withdraw the weapons." (more: see our Turkey coup file)
For immediate release, June 29, 2016: NM Environment Dept. Finalizes Consent Order on Los Alamos Lab Cleanup; Surrenders Enforcement to Nuclear Weaponeers
"The new Consent Order is a giveaway to the Department of Energy and the Lab, surrendering the strong enforceability of the old Consent Order. The new Order is also clearly the opposite of the old Consent Order, whose underlying intent was to make DOE and LANL get more money from Congress for accelerated cleanup. In contrast, the new Consent Order allows them to get out of future cleanup by simply claiming that it's too expensive or impractical to clean up..."
(view/download full press release PDF)
Public comments on the proposed (revised) LANL Consent Order
On March 30, 2016, the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) released for public comment its proposed 2016 Compliance Order on Consent ("Consent Order") governing cleanup at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). If implemented, the revised Consent Order will almost certainly create serious barriers to achieving cleanup, especially given the Lab's known opposition to full and complete cleanup. In addition, the proposed revised Consent Order limits public participation opportunities; undermines enforceability by the Environment Department; puts the Department of Energy (DOE) in the driver's seat; and lacks a final milestone compliance date. The proposed 2016 Consent Order is potentially a giant step backwards if the goal is to achieve genuine, comprehensive cleanup at LANL.
Thanks to all of you that sent in your comments.
See comments submitted by the public (PDF) See comment submitted by NukeWatch (PDF)
We await NMED's response to all submitted comments.
UNM Will Host "Symposium" Promoting Nuclear Weapons, Nuclear Triad
Albuquerque, June 20-21:
University of New Mexico will host an 'unprecedented' 2-day event featuring top military and Energy Dept. nuclear brass, along with weapons industry lobbyists, to promote nuclear weapons, and specifically, to support the modernization of all three legs of the nuclear triad in the face of growing criticism.
That UNM is hosting the Symposium is more evidence of the University of New Mexico's deepening involvement in nuclear weapons programs. UNM recently announced with Boeing, the U. of Texas and others that it was going to bid on the Sandia Labs management contract. (more on this at the Watchblog)
The 2016 Strategic Deterrence Symposium is organized by the 'Strategic Deterrent Coalition'- a self-proclaimed "non-profit, non-partisan, community-based organization of concerned citizens." (Whose address is given as: 1050 Connecticut Ave. NW, Washington, DC.)
"The single-issue focus of the Strategic Deterrent Coalition" is that the US "maintains a modern, safe, secure, effective and stabilizing Nuclear Triad deterrent".
"Rationality has never been the hallmark of any nation pursuing a nuclear arsenal or thinking about its employment. Such arsenals take on a life and logic of their own, commanding huge budgets and compelling decisions that march at an ever increasing tempo to the beat of fear, technology, status and vested interests."
- General George Lee Butler (Ret.) Former Commander US Strategic Command, in his memoir, "Uncommon Cause".
Speakers will include Admiral Cecil Haney, Commander of US Strategic Command; General Robin Rand, Commander of Air Force Global Strike Command; Major General Scott Jansson, Commander, Nuclear Weapons Center; NNSA administrator Frank Klotz, and officials from the Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Sandia Labs.
Note: The aforementioned 'Nuclear Weapons Center' is based at Kirtland AFB (adjoining the Albuquerque airport), and Kirtland is also the third largest installation of the Air Force Global Strike Command. Read more about Kirtland's emergence as a major hub of the nuclear weapons complex in our Kirtland AFB dossier.
More from the SDC website:
- "Founding organizations" include Barksdale Forward, Kirtland Partnership Committee, Minot Task Force21, Montana Defense Alliance...
- Sponsors of the event include Northrup Grumman, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, and Orbital ATK...
For immediate release May 17, 2016: Nuclear Watch NM Files Lawsuit Over Lack of Cleanup at the Los Alamos Lab
Santa Fe, NM. Nuclear Watch New Mexico has filed a lawsuit in federal court against the Department of Energy and Los Alamos National Security LLC (LANS), the for-profit operator of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, over their failure to meet cleanup milestones under a 2005 "Consent Order" they agreed to with the New Mexico Environment Department. The New Mexico Environmental Law Center is representing NukeWatch in this legal action to enforce cleanup at LANL.
The suit claims twelve violations, each ranging up to 675 days, with a civil penalty up to $37,500 for each day of violation. Our current cost estimate of the alleged violations approaches 300 million dollars and counting.
Jay Coghlan, NukeWatch Executive Director, commented, "The federal government plans to spend a trillion dollars over the next 30 years completely rebuilding U.S. nuclear forces. Meanwhile, cleanup at the Los Alamos Lab, the birthplace of nuclear weapons, continues to be delayed, delayed, delayed. We seek to make the for-profit nuclear weaponeers cleanup their radioactive and toxic mess first before making another one for a nuclear weapons stockpile that is already bloated far beyond what we need. Real cleanup would be a win-win for New Mexicans, permanently protecting our water and environment while creating hundreds of high paying jobs."
(view/download full press release PDF)
NukeWatch v. DOE, LANS
See all docs related to the ongoing Nuclear Watch lawsuit against DOE and LANS (the corporate management of Los Alamos Lab), over multiple missed deadlines and failures to execute cleanup of radioactive wastes at the Los Alamos site: Cleanup Lawsuit.
Command and Control- Screenings schedule The day we almost nuked Arkansas... "Cold War-era thriller with post-apocalyptic nightmare. Given it's all true, this one will stay with you for days after viewing." - Rolling Stone
Screenings schedule /
September 25, 2016, Berkeley, CA: Book event with Almighty author Dan Zak
2pm, Books Inc. of Berkeley, 1491 Shattuck Ave.
Moderated by Marylia Kelley of Tri-Valley CAREs. (more info)
Alliance For Nuclear Accountability Report Out-of-control U.S. nuclear weapons programs accelerate spending, proliferation, health and safety risks: The Trillion Dollar Trainwreck (PDF)
E.O.Wilson's biggest worry is nuclear war
"My main worry is nuclear war, as it should be for everybody... if something got out of control- it could happen in the middle east, it could happen from some stupid mistake in one of the other nuclear armed countries..." - E. O. Wilson (ref)
Nobel Obama's Nuke Pledge Reversed
From the same president who in 2009 called for a world free of nuclear weapons and promised to reduce their role in U.S. national security strategy:
A plan to spend a trillion dollars over the next 30 years on nuclear weapons.
Specifically, on 12 new nuclear-armed submarines, 100 new strategic bombers, 400 new intercontinental nuclear missiles, 1000 new nuclear-capable cruise missiles, hundreds of upgraded and improved nuclear bombs and warheads, and major additions and upgrades to all parts of the US nuclear weapons complex. See our nuclear modernization page for more on this.
Dr. James Doyle is an independent nuclear security specialist supported by the Ploughshares Fund and a non-resident associate of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University. Dr. Doyle also serves on Nuclear Watch New Mexico's steering committee.
LANL's Central Mission Los Alamos Lab officials have recently claimed that LANL has moved away from primarily nuclear weapons to "national security", but what truly remains as the Labs central mission? Here's the answer from one of its own documents:
LANL's "Central Mission"- Presented at: RPI Nuclear Data 2011 Symposium for
Criticality Safety and Reactor Applications (PDF) 4/27/11
Current nuclear stockpiles- for country reports and other details see original annotated infographic at Ploughshares.org.
Beyond the Summit:
New Approaches to Nuclear Security William Perry: "Danger of a nuclear catastrophe is greater than during the Cold War. Our public is blissfully unaware.
Consequently, the policies that this country follows are in no way commensurate to the danger."
Planned Eurasian Apocalypse, c. 1956
Here are the 1100 [declassified] nuclear targets in the 1956 US target list for the Eurasian communist nations. Click image above to see the interactive infographic at the Future of Life site- clicking on any target dot will bring up a satellite map of the target area with the blast zone, variable depending on the yield you choose, fallout paths, and other info.
Don't Bank on the Bomb 2015
In a 50% increase over last year's totals, 53 financial institutions prohibit or limit investments in nuclear weapon producers, according to Don't Bank on the Bomb (2015), published in November by Dutch peace organization PAX. The increase illustrates the growing stigmatization of nuclear weapons due to the renewed focus on their humanitarian consequences. The report also identifies 382 banks, insurance companies, and pension funds which have made USD 493 billion available to nuclear weapons producers since January 2012.
"One has to be irrationally optimistic to believe that we can keep these weapons in fallible human hands indefinitely and something terrible will not happen. We can and must steadily reduce the risk of nuclear explosions by accident, miscalculation or madness before it is too late."
Joseph Cirincione, testifying before the Democratic Platform Committee, June, 2016
Every little bit helps!
Remember: contributions are tax-deductible.
*Go to donations page* Thanks for your support!
"Controlled, universal disarmament is the imperative of our time. The demand for it by the hundreds of millions whose chief concern is the long future of themselves and their children will, I hope, become so universal and so insistent that no man, no government anywhere, can withstand it."
-President Dwight Eisenhower
Our Mission: Through comprehensive research, public education and effective citizen action, Nuclear Watch New Mexico seeks to promote safety and environmental protection at regional nuclear facilities, mission diversification away from nuclear weapons programs, greater accountability and cleanup in the nation-wide nuclear weapons complex, and consistent U.S. leadership toward a world free of nuclear weapons.